There are at present a number of resolutions in the United States Senate and House of Representatives which are related to Taiwan. Several of these support Taiwan's membership in international organizations, such as the United Nations, the WTO, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund.
One Senate Bill (S.1083), titled the "US-PRC National Security and Freedom Protection Act of 1997" is an omnibus bill, which was introduced in July after the Senate agreed to the one-year MFN-status extension for China. It contains several provisions important to Taiwan: a) conduct of a joint architecture study of the requirements for the establishment and operation of a theater ballistic missile defense for Taiwan, b) Taiwan's admission to WTO, and c) measures designed to get China to adhere to human rights.
The most important ones, however, are H. CON. RES. 100 - A concurrent resolution relating to the future status of Taiwan, introduced by Rep. Deutsch (D-FL), and a similar Senate resolution (S. CON. RES. 114) introduced by Senator Robert Torricelli (D-NJ). Also significant is H. CON. RES. 132 - A concur rent resolution relating to Taiwan's participation in the United Nations, introduced by Congressmen Solomon (R-NY) and Tom Lantos (D-CA).
On Friday, 1 August 1997, U.S. Senators Robert Torricelli (D-NJ) and Sam D. Brownback (R-KS) introduced a Resolution in the U.S. Senate in support of Taiwan as a free and democratic country. We urge our readers to write their Senators to endorse and cosponsor this Resolution.
S. RES. 114 Future Status of Taiwan as a free and democratic country
In the United States Senate, July 31st, 1997 Mr. TORRICELLI (for himself and Mr. BROWNBACK) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
On Tuesday, 29 July 1997, U.S. Congressmen Solomon (R-NY) and Tom Lantos (D-CA) introduced a Resolution in the U.S. House of Representatives in support of Taiwan's membership in the United Nations. Below is the text of the most important considerations as well as the operative part of the resolution.
H. CON. RES. 132: Taiwan's participation in the United Nations
Mr. SOLOMON (for himself and Mr. LANTOS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations
In mid-July 1997, the Kuomintang authorities on Taiwan initiated the fifth annual bid to join the United Nations by having nine of its allies in the UN submit a motion asking the UN General Assembly to consider membership for the island. The four previous motions were rejected at the insistence of China, which holds a seat in the Security Council.
The motion requested the General Assembly to "...re-examine the inadequacy of Resolution 2758 and rescind it, in order to restore without delay to the 21.5 million people of the Republic of China on Taiwan the lawful right to participate in all activities within the U.N. system."
Taiwan Communiqué comment: While we strongly support Taiwan's membership in the United Nations, the approach by the Kuomintang authorities is a dead-end street, because they still use the anachronistic "Republic of China" title, which represents a throwback to the Chinese Civil War.
In 1971, Resolution 2758 decided on which regime would represent China in the UN, the Chinese nationalists in Taipei or the Chinese Communists in Beijing. No decision was made who would represent Taiwan. According to the 1952 San Francisco Peace Treaty this was to be determined "...in accord with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations." Certainly in 1952 this meant independence.
An approach to UN membership will thus only succeed if Taiwan presents itself as a new and democratic nation. China may object for a while, but will eventually see that it is in its own interest to come to terms with a friendly neighbor instead of perpetuating an anachronistic Civil War.
When the handover of Hong Kong to China took place at the beginning of July 1997, it was accompanied by a large amount of hype and euphoria. Now comes the hangover. A brief overview:
* In mid-July 1997, the Hong Kong authorities announced that they would crack down on demonstrations that "...threaten national security." In China, the term national security is interpreted very broadly, and covers any expression of discontent.
For the time being, the Hong Kong interpretation seems to have a slightly narrower definition: the Hong Kong authorities specified that in particular promotion of Taiwan or Tibetan independence would fall under the new rule.
The new rule was immediately attacked in Hong Kong as restrictive of free speech. Paul Harris, chairman of the Hong Kong-based Human Rights Monitor said that the move amounted to a violation of free speech: "supporting Taiwan or Tibet is a political view, which people are entitled to express, provided they do so in a peaceful manner."
* A second matter of deep concern are the proposals for the elections of the future legislative council, which is to be elected in the Spring of 1998. The Council is to have 60 members, but the Beijing-installed administration of Tung Chee-hwa is now proposing that only 20 members of the Council are to be popularly elected. Ten would be named by a Beijing-appointed electoral college of course closely manipulated by Beijing and the remaining 30 to be picked by "functional constituencies."
These functional constituencies are not new to Hong Kong, but they had been broadened by Mr. Chris Patten to include some 2.7 million voters virtually amounting to universal suffrage. However, under the Tung proposals, the functional constituencies would be reduced back to some 180,000 corporate leaders, which are also subject to manipulation by Beijing.
Taiwan Communiqué comment: As was already
made clear by Taiwan's leaders and the Taiwanese people on the occasion of
the Hong Kong handover, the "One Country, Two systems" concept
is rejected outright as a model for Taiwan. The recent developments make
it all the more obvious that China has no intention of letting democracy
bloom in Hong Kong. The chance is even less they would allow any democracy
Back to: Table of Contents
Copyright © 1997 Taiwan Communiqué